My Year with Real Constraints

I (sort of) did (tried) it (kind of)! While I have spent years learning how to declutter, make higher quality purchases, curate a wardrobe for the real me, etc., I had given less thought about setting a finite limit on my acquisitions like TiffanieDarke’s #ruleof5. Informed by Hot or Cool’s Report “Unfit, Unfair, Unfashionable,” Tiffanie quantified a carbon limit for those living in affluent countries. Working with this number this year drew my attention to my motivations to acquire (which are not always noble). I noticed a distinct shift in the types of things I decided to acquire this year, after much deliberation. I also noticed (okay, my spouse noticed) my penchant for storytelling; the many justifications, rationalizations, and otherwise, tall tales I developed and shared with others to explain why this or that acquisition was an “exception” to the rule.

What did I buy?

Technically, I purchased 10 BRAND NEW items this year, about five of which I think should legitimately count. These items included two black silk blouses, one to help me wear a $12 secondhand skirt I purchased in 2022 with no plan and the other for a skirt I’ve owned for 20 years (my beloved peacock gem) that I’ve worn 3 times. That’s right, 3 times. The fact I can remember it is 3 is both remarkable and troublesome. Other items included a wrinkle-resistant white blouse specifically for when I need to go meet with my Dean, an organic cotton grey cable knit cardigan that my wife and I are “time sharing” (so, I really don’t think that should count against MY total), and a green romper my wife purchased for me on our bucket-list trip to Stockholm (so really, that’s just tourism, and technically, a gift, right?). Whatever the case, that romper helped me break out a treasured belt I’ve had for 15 years with few viable options for utilization. Not pictured? A few pairs of high quality sweatpants that replaced some cheap sweats I wore out during my gardening activities (so, given their potential longevity, that shouldn’t count, right?), and two hoodies and a denim skirt from a San Diego secondhand binge with my teenage niece (so, that’s just an entertainment expense, really). And, oh by the way, I rented my work clothing for 5 months this year. Is that cheating? As I added these items to my wardrobe, I stuck to my one-in-three-out rule, donating at least 30 pre-loved items from my closet, which takes my total wardrobe number down to 150 (from 500+).

Reflections

1. Almost none of these items were the result of an emotional impulse.

2. All were purchased with a long-term wearing strategy in mind, taking Alec Leach’s BIFL (buy it for life) strategy to heart.

3. Most are enjoying a high rate of utilization.

4. Some have increased the utilization of things I already owned but wasn’t using.

5. Most are built to last, giving me a potential good wear-to-investment return.

6. Almost all were acquired from brands with a pointed sustainability strategy and a moderate level of transparency about where the thing came from and who made it.

7. Almost all can be passed on to said niece who I think (fingers crossed) will still think they are cool after my long wear.

Having a firm constraint on what I bring into my closet has increased the quality, utilization, and my satisfaction with what I acquire as well as the things I already own. My creativity has been enhanced. I bought NOTHING this year that I couldn’t afford, didn’t have room for, or wasn’t going to wear often… I have NO REGRETS. And, I’m beginning to release my grip on the “never wear the same things twice” rule that has dominated my fashion repertoire. Instead, wearing a well-loved, well-liked garment is a badge of honor. Happy New Year!

A Scholarship of The Ego

What started as a college project on "fashion therapy" sparked a 20-year journey into the psychology of dress. From exploring how changing your look can boost mood, to understanding how we shape identity through others’ perceptions, this blog dives into the deep connections between fashion, self-image, and consumer behavior. Read more about the surprising science behind what we wear.
GO TO

Why Spirituality? Why Now?

On the Business of Fashion podcast, Sadhguru called out the fashion industry’s role in environmental harm—and offered a solution rooted in tradition and mindfulness. His Fashion for Peace initiative connects American designers with natural fiber artisans in India, aiming to replace harmful synthetics. He also shared a powerful message on identity and the Buddhist idea of “no self,” linking fashion, well-being, and the deeper search for meaning. Read more about this refreshing intersection of style and spirit.
LEARN MORE
Scroll to Top
Share via
Copy link